Marine NavigationAustralia · 2026
Seamanship & Safety

Marine Passage Planning

Route autogeneration is a planning assistant, not a plan. This is the four-stage method that turns a proposed track into a passage you can actually monitor and abort.

A four-waypoint route plotted across charted water with depth contours and soundings, a compass rose, and the cross-track error limit marked at one waypoint. WP1WP2WP3WP4 XTE 0.2 814221131 N ROUTE · XTE
A route exists to answer questions. Every leg is checked against depth, survey quality, tide and an escape option.

A passage plan is not a route on a screen. It is the set of decisions you have already made, so that the person on watch at 0300 in worsening conditions does not have to make them from scratch.

Modern equipment has made the drawing of a route trivial and the thinking easier to skip. The four-stage method below is the professional structure, scaled sensibly for a recreational boat.

#Stage 1: appraisal

Gather everything before drawing anything.

The vessel. Draft, air draft, fuel range under power, water, realistic speed in the expected conditions, autopilot power consumption, crew number and experience.

The charts. Current electronic charts for the whole route, plus an independent offline set. Check the Australian Hydrographic Office for relevant Notices to Mariners, and read the Zone of Confidence for any area you will approach closely. See marine charts Australia for why this matters more than GNSS accuracy.

The tide and current. Heights and times at the relevant standard and secondary ports, tidal streams through any constriction, and the vertical datum the chart uses. The tides and currents guide covers the arithmetic.

The weather. Forecast, warnings, and the synoptic pattern behind them rather than a single app's summary. See weather routing.

The destination and the alternatives. Entry constraints, bar crossings, marina depths, after-hours access, and — critically — which alternatives are tenable in which wind directions.

The regulatory picture. Safety equipment required for the waters you will enter, which differs by state and territory and by distance from shore. Confirm against AMSA and your state or territory maritime authority rather than memory.

#Stage 2: planning

Now draw the route, and then interrogate it.

A four-waypoint route plotted across charted water with depth contours and soundings, a compass rose, and the cross-track error limit marked at one waypoint. WP1WP2WP3WP4 XTE 0.2 814221131 N ROUTE · XTE
Fig. 1 — A route exists to answer questions. Every leg is checked against depth, survey quality, tide and an escape option.

For each leg, check:

  • Depth. Charted depth, expected tide at the time you will be there, your draft, your margin
  • Survey quality. Is this leg crossing a low-confidence area? If so, widen the margins and consider a detour
  • Hazards. Reefs, wrecks, obstructions, isolated dangers, fish-farm and mooring areas
  • Restricted and regulated areas. Traffic schemes, port limits, exclusion zones, marine parks
  • Air draft under bridges and cables, against the tide state on arrival
  • Lights and marks that will be available at night
  • Radar conspicuousness of the coastline, for a night or poor-visibility approach
  • Escape. If conditions deteriorate on this leg, where do you go?

Then set the monitoring parameters the electronics will actually use:

System schematic
Cross track error alarm:   0.2 NM coastal / 0.5 NM offshore
Depth alarm:               draft + margin
Arrival radius:            sensible for the waypoint's purpose
CPA / TCPA profile:        coastal or offshore
Anchor watch:              set on arrival, not at 0200

A waypoint should exist for a reason — a course change, a hazard clearance, a decision point. A route of forty waypoints placed to trace a coastline precisely is harder to monitor than a route of eight placed to answer questions.

Also decide, in advance:

  • the go / no-go criteria for departure
  • the abort criteria for each leg
  • the point of no return where continuing becomes the safer option
  • who ashore holds the plan, and when they should raise the alarm

Write these down. Under pressure, an agreed threshold is much easier to act on than a judgement call.

#Stage 3: execution

Execution is the decision to go, and the adjustments made to the plan on the day.

Departure timing is usually a tide, light or weather-window problem:

  • leaving on the ebb to carry favourable stream
  • arriving at a bar or entrance on a rising tide in daylight
  • timing a tidal gate
  • crossing a shipping lane at right angles, in good visibility, well clear of traffic concentration

Before slipping lines, run the departure checklist — and be willing to use the go / no-go criteria you wrote yesterday, including when the crew wants to leave and the criteria say no.

#Stage 4: monitoring

This is the stage electronics have made deceptively easy. A vessel symbol tracking a magenta line looks like successful navigation.

Monitoring means continuously answering: is the boat where the plan expects, and does the plan still make sense?

Cross-check position independently. Radar range and bearing to a charted feature. Depth against the expected contour. A transit or leading line. Sea-state and visual observation matching expectation. If GNSS and the world disagree, find out why before continuing.

Watch the depth, not only the chart. Depth is a live measurement of reality; the chart is a historical model of it. A depth that reads consistently shallower than charted is a warning worth acting on.

Re-forecast. Fetch weather at planned intervals and compare against what you were given at departure. A forecast that has shifted is a reason to revisit the plan, not a curiosity.

Log. Position, course, speed, wind, barometer, engine hours and anything notable, at a regular interval. A written log is the fallback when the electronics fail, and it makes drift in the situation visible.

Confirm the GNSS source. Particularly after a firmware update or refit, the network may be using a weaker position source than you think. The GNSS guide covers source selection.

#A worked coastal example

A 40 ft yacht, 1.9 m draft, planning an overnight coastal passage of about 110 NM.

StageDecisions made in advance
Appraisal6.5 kn planning speed → 17 h. Charts current, two Notices affecting the approach. Neap tides. Forecast 15 to 20 kn on the beam, easing.
PlanningNine waypoints. Two low-ZOC areas avoided entirely. Two bail-out anchorages identified, each tenable in the forecast direction. Depth alarm 3.5 m, XTE 0.2 NM.
ExecutionDepart 1600 to make the entrance after dawn on a rising tide. Go / no-go: abort if the warning is upgraded or crew is unwell.
MonitoringRadar and depth cross-check at each waypoint. Weather refetch at 2200 and 0400. Log hourly. Bail-out decision point at 0100.

Nothing in that table is exotic. All of it is easier to decide at anchor than at 0300.

#Departure checklist

  • weather and warnings reviewed, forecast source noted
  • tide and stream computed for the whole passage
  • charts current; Notices to Mariners checked
  • route reviewed leg by leg for depth, hazards and survey quality
  • alarms set: depth, XTE, CPA/TCPA, arrival
  • primary GNSS source confirmed
  • backup navigation charged, offline charts downloaded and opened
  • distress beacon registration and expiry checked; safety equipment verified against the requirements for the waters concerned
  • handheld VHF charged; DSC MMSI confirmed programmed
  • fuel, water, oil, filters, bilge and rig checked
  • crew briefed: plan, watch system, night orders, safety equipment locations
  • shore contact holds the plan and knows when to escalate

#Bottom line

The electronics will happily take you along a line. Passage planning is the work of deciding, in advance and in daylight, whether that line is the right one — and what you will do when it stops being the right one.

Common questions

Short answers to the questions this guide raises most often.

Can I trust automatic route generation on a chartplotter?

Treat it as a planning assistant, never as autonomous navigation. Autorouting works from chart data whose survey confidence it does not evaluate, and it cannot know your draft margin, your crew's tolerance, the state of the tide when you arrive, or which anchorages are tenable in the forecast wind. Review every leg manually for depth, hazards, bridges, restricted areas, weather, tide and Zone of Confidence.

How much under-keel clearance should I plan for?

Enough to absorb chart error, tide prediction error, swell, squat and your own depth-sounder offset. Available water is charted depth plus actual water level minus draft minus margin, and each of those terms has uncertainty. In an area with low Zone of Confidence, increase the margin substantially rather than trusting the printed sounding.

What should I check before every departure?

Weather and warnings, tide and current for the whole passage, chart currency and Notices to Mariners for the area, fuel and water, the primary GNSS source, backup navigation charged with offline coverage, distress beacon registration and expiry, handheld VHF charge, the crew's understanding of the plan, and who ashore knows where you are going and when to worry.

How often should I fix my position independently of GPS?

Often enough that a GNSS failure or a chart datum problem would be caught quickly rather than hours later. On a coastal passage, comparing radar ranges and bearings to charted features, depth against the expected contour, and transits or leading lines where they exist, takes a minute and validates the entire electronic picture.

These guides pick up where this one stops.

An electronic chart extract showing shallow water shaded blue grading to white in deeper water, depth contours, printed soundings, a drying reef, an isolated danger symbol and a Zone of Confidence category diamond. 3₂5₈11141721263329 B AusENC · ZOC

Foundations

Australian marine charts, AusENC, ZOC and S-100

Why a beautifully rendered electronic chart can still be built on an old survey — and how to read Zone of Confidence, manage chart datum and plan around survey quality in Australian waters.

Foundations7 min read

Read the guide
A tide curve rising and falling above the chart datum line, with a vessel at mid-tide and the remaining clearance between keel and seabed dimensioned. CHART DATUM (LAT) under-keel margin HEIGHT OF TIDE

Foundations

Tides, currents and chart datum

Available water depth is charted depth plus tide, minus draft, minus margin — and every one of those terms carries uncertainty. Here is how to compute it honestly.

Foundations6 min read

Read the guide
A weather prognosis chart showing closed isobars around a 994 hectopascal low, a cold front with triangular barbs, and a wind barb indicating 25 knots. L 994 25 kn GRIB · 24 H PROG

Seamanship & Safety

Weather data and routing offshore

Offshore connectivity has made professional weather data available to recreational boats. Understanding model uncertainty is what turns that data into good decisions.

Seamanship & Safety7 min read

Read the guide
A diagram of primary, secondary and non-electronic navigation layers, with a single failure line crossing out the primary layer while the other two survive. PRIMARY MFD · network SECONDARY tablet NON-ELEC compass SINGLE FAILURE FAILURE DOMAINS

Seamanship & Safety

Navigation redundancy that actually works

Redundancy is not buying two of everything. It is preventing one failure from removing several critical capabilities at once — which means the best backup usually looks nothing like the primary.

Seamanship & Safety7 min read

Read the guide
Three navigation satellites transmitting to a vessel on a curved horizon, with the heading arrow pointing 040 degrees and the course over ground arrow pointing 057 degrees, showing the effect of current. HDG 040° COG 057° GPS · GALILEO · BEIDOU

Foundations

Marine GPS and GNSS explained

What a GNSS receiver actually knows, why display precision is not accuracy, how course over ground differs from heading, and how to build position redundancy that survives a network failure.

Foundations8 min read

Read the guide
Two vessels seen at night, the nearer one showing a red port sidelight, a green starboard sidelight and a masthead light, with stars above a dark horizon. SIDELIGHTS · MASTHEAD

Seamanship & Safety

Night and poor-visibility navigation

After dark the boat has not changed, but almost everything about how you navigate it has. Screen brightness, watch discipline and radar habits decide how safe the night is.

Seamanship & Safety7 min read

Read the guide

Other guides that depend on the ideas on this page.

This guide is independent editorial information, not a substitute for official regulation. Equipment requirements, licensing and chart currency differ by jurisdiction and change over time — confirm the current position with the AMSA, the Australian Hydrographic Office, ACMA and your state or territory maritime authority before relying on it.